Tuesday, October 23, 2007

repent for what?




sooner or later, i knew some dick clark head would comment that i need to repent. repent for what? for the 1000 oragasms i have had before marriage? for rooting for the bull to beat the shit out of the bull rider? for saying shit in the previous sentence? for over using question marks? for reading karl marx? for getting bad marx in school? for not learning how to play the harpo? for watching silberg's "getting played?" for using electracity to listen to carmen? for spending a night at the opera?
you want me to repent, but you don't even know who i am. am i cyborg, mellish, silberg, horace mann, the chairman? have you taken the time to find out? i'm sure you think jesus is coming, but i think the only guy cuming has a smiley on his face and lives on sesame street. to you, my commenting friend, i ask this...
if jesus were going to come back, why didn't he come to stop the slaughter of the indigenous people by the white colonialists who claimed to believe in him? why didn't he come to stop slavery, the theft of mexico, the holocaust, the bombing of iraq, the destruction of vietnam, lynching, cluster bombs, famine, drought, and so much else? is it because "he" gave us free will? well, if i create a species that goes on to commit murder, rape and theft on a genocidal scale, and does these things in my name, what does that say about me and the species i created? or do the facts not matter, because you have faith hill, and that's all that counts. well, listen dracula, i'm not gonna dance around this anymore, so pick a rumba from one to ten. oh, you picked one? good, because that's your iq! i will meet you on any website, and blog your arse into the ground, and that's the truth, williams. i would give you a carl, but i don't have your number.
don't be psalm over my response. isaiah alot of things, even on my job. parenthetically, have you read any good books lately? do you know anyone who will "begat" any time soon? speaking of the bible, what do you have to say about that part in numbers where moses and his people are told by god to kill all the men and women in the town, but to keep the young girls for themselves. do you remember that part? what's your defense of it? oh, that must be one of those parts that we are not supposed to take literally. yeah, that's how it works. if we like it, we agree to take it literally, and if we don't like it, it's a metaphor and it's not to be taken literally. well, what's the metaphor for killing and rape? what deeper meaning does that hold for us to uncover?
you, my true believer, obviously have a lot of free time on your hands if you have time to read my blog. why aren't you out "saving souls?" when's the last time you spoke in tongues? when's the last time you got a cone with david at jp licks and went to the met for a night at the opera with your brothers under the skin? to be frank, this is not a riddle. a night at the opera was a movie that kept it reel, but what do you know about that, father divine? what do you know about the church of what's happening now? don't flip out on me, wilson, just listen to what i'm saying.
can you hear me? i think i will rot when i die. instead of dreaming about an afterlife, i think we should fight to make the present on this earth as heavenly as it can be. but no, it is easier to feel superior to others and to think that because you happen to believe something that all your problems are solved. well, not all of us accept a bribe so easily. there are still some of us who try to think for ourselves and understand that a book that is thousands of years old may not hold all the answers we need to solve the pressing problems of the present.
so, to make a long story bobby short, go fuck yourself, and pray that i don't prey on you in a future blog.

No comments: